By Barry Miller
The sequel to From lifestyles to God, this article bargains a portrait of God that contrasts sharply with that supplied through perfect-being theology. It exposes the absurdity of this view and indicates how considerably God differs from even the main exalted of his creatures.
Read or Download A Most Unlikely God: A Philosophical Enquiry into the Nature of God PDF
Similar theology books
Crossing the bounds of philosophy, theology, psychology, and literature, the Danish author Soren Kierkegaard is considered probably the most major and influential figures in modern suggestion. In Kierkegaard's view, religion is the main crucial activity of existence. religion isn't really an issue of dogmatic adherence, yet quite of subjective ardour.
"Dionysius the Areopagite" is the biblical identify selected through the pseudonymous writer of an influential physique of Christian theological texts, relationship from round 500 C. E. The Celestial Hierarchy, The Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, The Divine Names, and the paranormal Theology supply a synthesis of biblical interpretation, liturgical spirituality, and Neoplatonic philosophy.
This choice of essays, written among 1975 and 1987, covers themes together with the doctrine of analogy, the Trinity, theological realism, the problims of evil and ache, ecclesiology, and the so-called theistic proofs. the sooner writings relect the author's education as a thinker within the Anglo-Aamerican analytic culture.
It is a groundbreaking, hugely unique paintings of postmodern feminist theology from the most very important authors within the box. The Face of the Deep deconstructs the Christian doctrine of production which claims transcendent Lord unilaterally created the universe out of not anything. Catherine Keller's impassioned, sleek meditation develops an alternate illustration of the cosmic artistic strategy, drawing upon Hebrew myths of production, from chaos, and interesting with the political and the paranormal, the literary and the clinical, the sexual and the racial.
- Political Worship: Ethics for Christian Citizens (Oxford Studies in Theological Ethics)
- The Faith Of The Christian Church: An Introduction To Theology
- The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science
- Redemptive Suffering: Lessons Learned from the Garden of Gethsemane
- The Judgment Seat of Christ
Additional info for A Most Unlikely God: A Philosophical Enquiry into the Nature of God
It does not deny that even now descriptions are conceivable which fit no individual that has ever existed but which may well turn out to be a perfect fit for some individual in another thousand years or more. Hence, my claim is not that no description could ever be uniquely satisfied by a future individual, for of course it is possible, albeit highly improbable, that I now describe my niece to be born in two years, the last current model Mercedes to come off the assembly line in three years from now, and the island to emerge from the Atlantic ocean in fifty years, and describe them no less successfully than a niece born last year, a Mercedes now in the showroom, or the island of St.
As a caveat, I should add that to say that Socrates socratizes his existence is not to say that Socrates does anything to his existence. Socrates does not impose the limit or bound, but is that limit or bound. Not even God imposes the bound. True, he is its contractor or constrictor, but that means merely that he brings it about that (existence occurs as contracted to the ways in which it is manifested by Socrates). It does not mean that there is any such entity as existence tout court on which he acts to contract it.
Tb~M~Tap. 17. , ~TbM~Tap. 18. , ~TbM~Tap. 19. It is possible that the conditions at time b could have been such as to have prevented Socrates from ever coming to exist. 20. But, had Socrates never come to exist, he could never have been referred to. 21. Therefore, at time b it would have been possible that 'Socrates' never have referred to Socrates. 22. But, had 'Socrates' never referred to Socrates, '"Socrates" refers to Socrates'would not have been true at time a. 23. 18). In examining the argument's premisses, it needs to be remembered that the necessity being employed is not logical but is the kind which Prior confessed to borrowing from Ferdinand of Cordova, namely, the notion of a I truth that can no longer be prevented' because the time for preventing it is now past.